<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="de">
	<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.de/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Cooper_%26_Krueger_2006</id>
	<title>Cooper &amp; Krueger 2006 - Versionsgeschichte</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.de/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Cooper_%26_Krueger_2006"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.de/index.php?title=Cooper_%26_Krueger_2006&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-08T13:03:18Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Versionsgeschichte dieser Seite in Open Source Ecology - Germany</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.de/index.php?title=Cooper_%26_Krueger_2006&amp;diff=20725&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Andreas Plank am 13. Mai 2020 um 16:10 Uhr</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.de/index.php?title=Cooper_%26_Krueger_2006&amp;diff=20725&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2020-05-13T16:10:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left diff-editfont-monospace&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;de&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Abfassung vorher&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Version vom 13. Mai 2020, 16:10 Uhr&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l1&quot; &gt;Zeile 1:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Zeile 1:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Literatur | Titel=The Refuelable Zinc-air Battery: Alternative Techniques for Zinc and Electrolyte Regeneration | &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;Autor&lt;/del&gt;=&lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;Cooper&lt;/del&gt;, &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;J. F.; Krueger&lt;/del&gt;, &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;R. &lt;/del&gt;| &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;Jahr&lt;/del&gt;=&lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;2006 &lt;/del&gt;| &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;Monat&lt;/del&gt;=&lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;Januar &lt;/del&gt;| &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;Tag&lt;/del&gt;=&lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;19 &lt;/del&gt;| Zusammenfassung=An investigation was conducted into alternative techniques for zinc and electrolyte regeneration and reuse in the refuelable zinc/air battery that was developed by LLNL and previously tested on a moving electric bus using cut wire. Mossy zinc was electrodeposited onto a bipolar array of inclined Ni plates with an energy consumption of 1.8 kWh/kg. Using a H{sub 2}-depolarized anode, zinc was deposited at 0.6 V (0.8 kA/m{sup 2}); the open circuit voltage was 0.45 V. Three types of fuel pellets were tested and compared with results for 0.75 mm cut wire: spheres produced in a spouted bed (UCB); coarse powder produced by gas-atomization (Noranda); and irregular pellets produced by chopping 1-mm plates of compacted zinc fines (Eagle-Picher, Inc.). All three types transported within the cell. The coarse powder fed continuously from hopper to cell, as did the compacted pellets (&amp;lt; 0.83 mm). Large particles (&amp;gt; 0.83 mm; Eagle-Picher and UCB) failed to feed from hopper into cell, being held up in the 2.5 mm wide channel connecting hopper to cell. Increasing channel width to {approx}3.5 mm should allow all three types to be used. Energy losses were determined for shorting of cells during refueling. The shorting currents between adjacent hoppers through zinc particle bridges were determined using both coarse powder and chopped compressed zinc plates. A physical model was developed allowing scaling our results for electrode polarization and bed resistance Shorting was found to consume &amp;lt; 0.02% of the capacity of the cell and to dissipate {approx}0.2 W/cell of heat. Corrosion rates were determined for cut wire in contact with current collector materials and battery-produced ZnO-saturated electrolyte. The rates were 1.7% of cell capacity per month at ambient temperatures; and 0.08% of capacity for 12 hours at 57 C. The total energy conversion efficiency for zinc recovery using the hydrogen was estimated at 34% (natural gas to battery terminals)--comparable to fuel cells. Producing zinc shot was quoted at 1.5-3 cents/lb above base price (52 cents/lb, ASM) for super purity ingot. Both the spouted-bed and the Eagle-Picher processes might conceivably be configured for fleet operation in user-owned and operated equipment located a the fleet’s home base. This would eliminate the need for green-field industrial plants and fuels distribution systems. Scaleup of the spouted bed process and detailed examination of the Eagle-Picher process are recommended. | &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;Nummer&lt;/del&gt;=&lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;UCRL-TR-218414 | Herausgeber=Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA | Ort=US | Seiten=1-29 &lt;/del&gt;| Online=http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/898511-0h1lWn/ &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;| DOI=10.2172/898511 &lt;/del&gt;| Zugriff=2020-04-17 }}&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Literatur&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;|Autor=Cooper, J. F.; Krueger, R.&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;|Tag=19&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;|Monat=Januar&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;|Jahr=2006&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|Titel=The Refuelable Zinc-air Battery: Alternative Techniques for Zinc and Electrolyte Regeneration&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;|Stichworte=english article; zinc-air battery; electrolyte regeneration;&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;Herausgeber&lt;/ins&gt;=&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL)&lt;/ins&gt;, &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;Livermore&lt;/ins&gt;, &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;CA&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;Nummer&lt;/ins&gt;=&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;UCRL-TR-218414&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;Ort&lt;/ins&gt;=&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;US&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;Seiten&lt;/ins&gt;=&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;1-29&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|Zusammenfassung=An investigation was conducted into alternative techniques for zinc and electrolyte regeneration and reuse in the refuelable zinc/air battery that was developed by LLNL and previously tested on a moving electric bus using cut wire. Mossy zinc was electrodeposited onto a bipolar array of inclined Ni plates with an energy consumption of 1.8 kWh/kg. Using a H{sub 2}-depolarized anode, zinc was deposited at 0.6 V (0.8 kA/m{sup 2}); the open circuit voltage was 0.45 V. Three types of fuel pellets were tested and compared with results for 0.75 mm cut wire: spheres produced in a spouted bed (UCB); coarse powder produced by gas-atomization (Noranda); and irregular pellets produced by chopping 1-mm plates of compacted zinc fines (Eagle-Picher, Inc.). All three types transported within the cell. The coarse powder fed continuously from hopper to cell, as did the compacted pellets (&amp;lt; 0.83 mm). Large particles (&amp;gt; 0.83 mm; Eagle-Picher and UCB) failed to feed from hopper into cell, being held up in the 2.5 mm wide channel connecting hopper to cell. Increasing channel width to {approx}3.5 mm should allow all three types to be used. Energy losses were determined for shorting of cells during refueling. The shorting currents between adjacent hoppers through zinc particle bridges were determined using both coarse powder and chopped compressed zinc plates. A physical model was developed allowing scaling our results for electrode polarization and bed resistance Shorting was found to consume &amp;lt; 0.02% of the capacity of the cell and to dissipate {approx}0.2 W/cell of heat. Corrosion rates were determined for cut wire in contact with current collector materials and battery-produced ZnO-saturated electrolyte. The rates were 1.7% of cell capacity per month at ambient temperatures; and 0.08% of capacity for 12 hours at 57 C. The total energy conversion efficiency for zinc recovery using the hydrogen was estimated at 34% (natural gas to battery terminals)--comparable to fuel cells. Producing zinc shot was quoted at 1.5-3 cents/lb above base price (52 cents/lb, ASM) for super purity ingot. Both the spouted-bed and the Eagle-Picher processes might conceivably be configured for fleet operation in user-owned and operated equipment located a the fleet’s home base. This would eliminate the need for green-field industrial plants and fuels distribution systems. Scaleup of the spouted bed process and detailed examination of the Eagle-Picher process are recommended.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;DOI&lt;/ins&gt;=&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;10.2172/898511&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|Online=http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/898511-0h1lWn/&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|Zugriff=2020-04-17&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;}}&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Andreas Plank</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.opensourceecology.de/index.php?title=Cooper_%26_Krueger_2006&amp;diff=20446&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Andreas Plank: Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „{{Literatur | Titel=The Refuelable Zinc-air Battery: Alternative Techniques for Zinc and Electrolyte Regeneration | Autor=Cooper, J. F.; Krueger, R. | Jahr=200…“</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.opensourceecology.de/index.php?title=Cooper_%26_Krueger_2006&amp;diff=20446&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2020-04-17T20:10:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „{{Literatur | Titel=The Refuelable Zinc-air Battery: Alternative Techniques for Zinc and Electrolyte Regeneration | Autor=Cooper, J. F.; Krueger, R. | Jahr=200…“&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Neue Seite&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Literatur | Titel=The Refuelable Zinc-air Battery: Alternative Techniques for Zinc and Electrolyte Regeneration | Autor=Cooper, J. F.; Krueger, R. | Jahr=2006 | Monat=Januar | Tag=19 | Zusammenfassung=An investigation was conducted into alternative techniques for zinc and electrolyte regeneration and reuse in the refuelable zinc/air battery that was developed by LLNL and previously tested on a moving electric bus using cut wire. Mossy zinc was electrodeposited onto a bipolar array of inclined Ni plates with an energy consumption of 1.8 kWh/kg. Using a H{sub 2}-depolarized anode, zinc was deposited at 0.6 V (0.8 kA/m{sup 2}); the open circuit voltage was 0.45 V. Three types of fuel pellets were tested and compared with results for 0.75 mm cut wire: spheres produced in a spouted bed (UCB); coarse powder produced by gas-atomization (Noranda); and irregular pellets produced by chopping 1-mm plates of compacted zinc fines (Eagle-Picher, Inc.). All three types transported within the cell. The coarse powder fed continuously from hopper to cell, as did the compacted pellets (&amp;lt; 0.83 mm). Large particles (&amp;gt; 0.83 mm; Eagle-Picher and UCB) failed to feed from hopper into cell, being held up in the 2.5 mm wide channel connecting hopper to cell. Increasing channel width to {approx}3.5 mm should allow all three types to be used. Energy losses were determined for shorting of cells during refueling. The shorting currents between adjacent hoppers through zinc particle bridges were determined using both coarse powder and chopped compressed zinc plates. A physical model was developed allowing scaling our results for electrode polarization and bed resistance Shorting was found to consume &amp;lt; 0.02% of the capacity of the cell and to dissipate {approx}0.2 W/cell of heat. Corrosion rates were determined for cut wire in contact with current collector materials and battery-produced ZnO-saturated electrolyte. The rates were 1.7% of cell capacity per month at ambient temperatures; and 0.08% of capacity for 12 hours at 57 C. The total energy conversion efficiency for zinc recovery using the hydrogen was estimated at 34% (natural gas to battery terminals)--comparable to fuel cells. Producing zinc shot was quoted at 1.5-3 cents/lb above base price (52 cents/lb, ASM) for super purity ingot. Both the spouted-bed and the Eagle-Picher processes might conceivably be configured for fleet operation in user-owned and operated equipment located a the fleet’s home base. This would eliminate the need for green-field industrial plants and fuels distribution systems. Scaleup of the spouted bed process and detailed examination of the Eagle-Picher process are recommended. | Nummer=UCRL-TR-218414 | Herausgeber=Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA | Ort=US | Seiten=1-29 | Online=http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/898511-0h1lWn/ | DOI=10.2172/898511 | Zugriff=2020-04-17 }}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Andreas Plank</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>