Milker

Aus Open Source Ecology - Germany
Version vom 26. Februar 2015, 02:20 Uhr von Jan R.B.-Wein (Diskussion | Beiträge) (Add link to (public git) repository.)
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen

--> Updates & News (Forum) --> Repository (current status/most up to date) *work in progress*

Motivation for an autonomous milking ongoing robot (AMOR)

An autonomous system results in the following dis-/advantages:

  • + Indepence (no more need to be there to milk morning and evening, 7days/week)
  • - Machine service increases
  • + Technical knowledge increases, hence perhaps some other good robot ideas may evolve.
  • + Cows/Goats/Sheep can decide themselves when to get milked.
  • + Concentrated feed can be delivered automatically and according to milk delivered.
  • - Animals' possible illness not realized early enough. => Action taken too late. => Animal could die.
  • - Gathering at Milking robot leaves behind a lot of unusable muddy terrain at entrance (doors in general).
  • - Higher complexity in separation of milk for calves, though of course possible.
  • + Driving out and in of cattle no longer necessary as animals can get milked outside.
  • + Less material required (much shorter vacuum and milk tubes as compared to conventional non-automated distributed [at cow/goat..] milking)
  • ... and several others.


An ongoing system results in the following (dis-)advantages:

  • - Higher complexity.
  • + Independance of any external supplies.
   ** Water (heavily dependent on environment)
   ** Power (Solar/Heat/Water/MFC replaces Grid)
   ** Food (difficult, nevertheless this is planned for later revisions of AMOR)
  • - Redundancy of susceptible subsystems (Electronics, in general: The more complex the system the higher the vulnerability).
  • + Less cabling, water pipe laying and bundled maintenance (as you can wait for enough minor errors to accumulate before taking the system apart).
  • ... and several others.

High Level Overview

AMOR High Level Schematic PDF PDF Version: REV2, Improved & interconnected. AMOR High Level Schematic (REV2)


Separation in Subproblems & Technological Difficulties

AMOR of several submodules:

  • MECHANICAL CONSTRUCTION
    • - Difficult to achieve a robust, lightweight (for truck to lift) & cheap system at the same time.
    • + Rain serves as a water supply and natural (ecologic) and self-sustained washing. -> So AMOR must be waterproof!
  • VACUUM SYSTEM
    • - Difficult to be flexible in frequency (provide user settings) and keep it simple at the same time.
    • + Could be used for several other functionality than milking (doors, ...). => No hydraulics needed. Update: We have settled on keeping it all electric as it's much cheaper and we need electricity anyway.
    • Note: As the robotic manipulator should be flexible anyway as it could be hit by the cow, compressible air/vacuum could serve this purpose, too - but price of vacuum cylinders and the vulnerability to leakage remains a problem.
    • Vacuum pump: Any pump should do, as the required vacuum levels are low and we don't have a lot of volume to keep free of gases in a mobile system because there is not much piping.
  • STORAGE CONSTRUCTION
    • Milk
    • Food
    • Water
    • Energy
    • Database for animals milk (amount, properties, ...)
    • Database for organization of the cow's fertile cycle, ...
  • SENSORICS
    • Milk properties (flow rate, derivations of that, TODO)
    • Robotic manipulator (3D camera, washing mechanism)
    • Animal within milking construction => Door states.
  • ELECTRONICS
    • Control of Doors.
    • Control of Feeding (derived from amount of milk), but also accept some user constraints (lower / upper bounds for each type of food respectively).
    • Control of Robotic manipulator (joints, gripper).
    • Collection & storage of the stored animal & product data.
  • SOFTWARE
    • Microcontroller programs capable of controlling at least two AMOR system blocks (stacked next to each other).
    • compare ELECTRONICS.

Mechanic structure

The mechanic structure is free to choose. Builders might have their own preference of how to assemble a milking robot structure. Some may choose to bolt sqaure beams together, the others might prefer welding (Schweissen) steel or if they have a TIG (Tungsten) welder even aluminium.

For convenience I design and post my structure as a base and hope you give back your improvements to it by mentioning it in the forum, uploading to our repository or any other possibiity you see as appropriate.. [1]

Video of Prototyp 3 CAD

This video demonstrates how the robotic manipulator is about to work as well as the door mechanism: <video>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GawGF-8rVSY</video>


Vacuum System

Vacuum, Piping, Valves and near by infrastructure like a milk tank. All interconnected.

Power system

Several ideas for autonomous power can be found in the forum. The easiest solution for now will be to attach a truck or emergency generator (UPS) or simply an extension cord. So we need a possibility to plug it into the grid (1-phase might be too low, but let's go for that first as the vacuum system needs by far less energy in a mobile robot than in a conventional one). For regenerative purposes a 100 kW inverter is planned and is waiting to be tested (once I have the equipment). The last autumn prototype was a failure in too many aspects (rigidity, linear gliders of robotic manipulators) so that design was adapted in the meantime and is waiting for me finishing several blender addons. [2]

Discussion

Feel free to post critiques or technical stuff here - alternatively use the forum or use the "talk" page. --Jan

  • Topic
    • Answer
    • Another post
  • next topic
    • answer
  • ..

Forum

Open Source Ecology Germany - Forum: Thread AMOR