Industrial Hemp Harvesting Machine (fiber): Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Open Source Ecology - Germany
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
 
(31 dazwischenliegende Versionen desselben Benutzers werden nicht angezeigt)
Zeile 1: Zeile 1:
==File Sharing and Workflow==
+
[[File Sharing and Workflow (Hardware)]]
I am going to add a few short notes here about my thoughts related to file sharing and workflow to start with. <br>
 
What motivates me to do this is the impression that, while the workflow tools <br>
 
for software development are neatly realized and broadly used thanks to platforms like GitHub, <br>
 
the workflow tools for hardware projects, although they exist ([https://opentoolchain.org/ Open Toolchain Foundation]),<br>
 
a platform that would allow a combined use of these tools and a seamless bidirectional data flow is <br>
 
not quite there yet, or at least not in the open-source environment. <br>
 
  
===GitLab===
+
===Evolution der Blücher===
*als review Werkzeug, wenn alle die Information und die Dateien schon klassifiziert und aufgeräumt sind :)
+
#[https://youtu.be/GBtD1irbsr8 Ein-Trommel Blücher Prototyp/Labormaschine] <br>
*als workflow werkzeug für die reverse engineering/development Verfahren :/ <br>
+
#[https://youtu.be/A4CAPZ7KAtM Zwei-Trommel Blücher 02 Prototyp] <br>
 
+
#[https://youtu.be/J6jhyJNDN2A Zwei-Trommel Blücher 02 auf Traktor mit Rückfahreinrichtung] <br>
For example in GitLab I cannot preview images in large tile format, meaning that I have to open the <br>
+
#[https://youtu.be/EgHOhyGH-ww Hanfernte Zwei-Trommel Blücher 02 auf Neuholland Fahrgestell und Fahrwerk] <br>
file in order to see what is inside. If I wanted to download this file I can not do it from the file <br>
 
list but I also have to open the file or choose to download the whole "directory" which translates <br>
 
into a high data volume and a higher associated use of energy for its traffic. Another way is the <br>
 
cloning and pull-push request approach but for that, I need to install some software on my computer. <br>
 
 
 
The jargon used in platforms like GitHub makes things even less "user-friendly" since the average Joe  <br>
 
(Otto Normalverbraucher) or Jane whose contact with the digital world is limited to that of a user for<br>
 
practical purposes (saving files or surfing the web) might find this jargon somewhat abstract. In my <br>
 
computer a folder is a folder and I think is not a wild guess to assert that most people associate a folder <br>
 
with some type of container. In GitLab a folder is called a directory, I personally know that a directory <br>
 
is equivalent to a folder because I once used DOS over 20 years ago, otherwise, the first idea that <br>
 
comes to mind is a phone directory. <br>
 
 
 
Although the use and functions of, for example, GitLab are very well documented as it is the case for the <br>
 
[https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/topics/git/terminology.html GitLab Terminology]. Here one needs to pose the following question: Who wants to participate <br>
 
in the making of a copy of a harvesting machine? or Who wants to participate in the making of a personal <br>
 
Loom for woven textiles? or, in short, Who are the target users/collaborators for such a project? And yet, <br>
 
despite the answer, the reality is that the whole process should be as easy as possible if I want to maximize <br>
 
the participation level. A person whose interest is limited to the creation and formatting of text might find <br>
 
the task of writing such text in a wiki just too daunting and might choose to walk away. <br>
 
 
 
===wiki + Nextcloud===
 
*A wiki is a very useful container to tip ideas into at the start of a project. A good starting <br>
 
point that, later on, can be easily organized into a structural part of the project. The wiki <br>
 
facilitates the organization and the search for specifics within a project and within itself <br>
 
thanks to the use of links, embedded views and files, and other types of special formatting.<br>
 
A properly formatted wiki can be a very user-friendly entry point to the project for all users <br>
 
especially in combination with a text-poor file system.
 
*Nextcloud provides quite a comfortable coworking environment although I have noticed that the
 
functionality, associated software, and file accessibility depend on how the platform is configured by
 
the party offering the service and the permissions given to the participants. For example, it seems
 
that the configuration is most flexible when Nextcloud is being hosted in a local server for
 
internal use like in a company. There, permissions can be given on at least two levels: view and
 
download only, and view, download, move, delete, etc.
 
 
 
===wiki + Dropbox===
 
 
 
 
 
<gallery widths="300" heights="240" perrow="2>
 
Datei:Workflow basic.drawio.png|gerahmt|links|Possible workflow for the project
 
</gallery>
 
 
 
===The OHO Approach===
 
 
 
 
 
[https://wiki.opensourceecology.de/Git Git]
 
[https://gitlab.opensourceecology.de/verein/koordination/dokumentation/tools-for-documentation#documentation-creation Werkzeuge für Dokumentation]
 
 
 
one way folder (diode folders) for sharing raw information <br>
 
two way folders (with some restrictions e.g. deleting of files) for retrieving processed information<br>
 
at least three different access levels would be necessary<br>
 
admin/distributor --- contributor/developer --- user
 

Aktuelle Version vom 27. April 2023, 10:54 Uhr