Industrial Hemp Harvesting Machine (fiber): Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
K |
K |
||
Zeile 9: | Zeile 9: | ||
file in order to see what is inside. If I wanted to download this file I can not do it from the file <br> | file in order to see what is inside. If I wanted to download this file I can not do it from the file <br> | ||
list but I also have to open the file or choose to download the whole "directory" which translates <br> | list but I also have to open the file or choose to download the whole "directory" which translates <br> | ||
− | into a high data volume and a higher associated use of energy for its traffic. The jargon used in | + | into a high data volume and a higher associated use of energy for its traffic. Another way is the <br> |
− | platforms like github makes things even less user-friendly since the average Joe (Otto Normalverbraucher) | + | cloning and pull-push request approach, but for that I need to install some software on my computer. <br> |
− | or Jane whose contact with the digital world is limited to that of | + | |
− | (saving files or surfing the web) might find this jargon somewhat abstract. In my | + | The jargon used in platforms like github makes things even less user-friendly since the average Joe <br> |
− | is a folder and I thing is not a wild guess to assert that most people associate a folder with some | + | (Otto Normalverbraucher) or Jane whose contact with the digital world is limited to that of a user for<br> |
− | type of container. In GitLab a folder is called a directory, I personally know that a directory | + | practical purposes (saving files or surfing the web) might find this jargon somewhat abstract. In my <br> |
− | equivalent to a folder because I learned to use DOS over 20 years ago otherwise the first idea that <br> | + | computer a folder is a folder and I thing is not a wild guess to assert that most people associate a folder |
+ | with some type of container. In GitLab a folder is called a directory, I personally know that a directory <br> | ||
+ | is equivalent to a folder because I learned to use DOS over 20 years ago otherwise the first idea that <br> | ||
comes to mind is a phone directory. | comes to mind is a phone directory. | ||
Version vom 5. April 2023, 13:23 Uhr
I am going to add just a few notes here about the sharing of files and workflow to start with.
What motivates me to do this in the first place is the impression that, while the workflow tools
for software development are neatly realized and broadly used thanks to platforms like github,
the workflow tools for hardware projects, although they exist (Open Toolchain Foundation),
a platform that would allow a combined use of these tools and a seamless bidirectional data flow is
not quite there yet, or at least not in the open-source environment.
For example in gitlab I cannot preview images in large tile format, meaning that I have to open the
file in order to see what is inside. If I wanted to download this file I can not do it from the file
list but I also have to open the file or choose to download the whole "directory" which translates
into a high data volume and a higher associated use of energy for its traffic. Another way is the
cloning and pull-push request approach, but for that I need to install some software on my computer.
The jargon used in platforms like github makes things even less user-friendly since the average Joe
(Otto Normalverbraucher) or Jane whose contact with the digital world is limited to that of a user for
practical purposes (saving files or surfing the web) might find this jargon somewhat abstract. In my
computer a folder is a folder and I thing is not a wild guess to assert that most people associate a folder
with some type of container. In GitLab a folder is called a directory, I personally know that a directory
is equivalent to a folder because I learned to use DOS over 20 years ago otherwise the first idea that
comes to mind is a phone directory.
one way folder (diode folders) for sharing raw information
two way folders (with some restrictions e.g. deleting of files) for retrieving processed information
at least three different access levels would be necessary
admin/distributor --- contributor/developer --- user